★ Annual Review 2027 tickets now on sale Get your tickets →

News/Protests & Claims/Determination of Randolph-Sheppard Priority Requires More Than Inclusion in Competitive Range; COFC No. 17-847C, Texas v. United States
News·Protests & Claims Brief

Determination of Randolph-Sheppard Priority Requires More Than Inclusion in Competitive Range; COFC No. 17-847C, Texas v. United States

Pre-award protest arguing that the agency was required to make immediate award to the protester under the Randolph-Sheppard Act, which establishes priority for blind persons in awarding certain contracts, is dismissed as premature, where the protester was included in the competitive range, but the agency had not completed its evaluation of proposals, determined whether the protester offered a fair and reasonable price, or made an award decision.

🔒 Members Only · Protests & Claims BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every Brief, six days a week.
Not ready to join? Take the free Pub K Weekly digest.One email. Free. Top industry articles, the community calendar, and the latest job postings.