★ Annual Review 2027 tickets now on sale Get your tickets →

News/Compliance & Enforcement/Relators Cannot Allege Implied False Certification Theory and Rely on Discovery to Support it; United States District Court for the District of California No. 19-cv-02233-DMR, U.S. ex rel. Carl Kelley and Michael McElligott v. McKesson Corporation
False Claims Act·Compliance & Enforcement Brief

Relators Cannot Allege Implied False Certification Theory and Rely on Discovery to Support it; United States District Court for the District of California No. 19-cv-02233-DMR, U.S. ex rel. Carl Kelley and Michael McElligott v. McKesson Corporation

The district court granted McKesson’s motion to dismiss a qui tam case alleging the defendant submitted false claims for payment to the Department of Veterans Affairs under its contract for pharmaceuticals.

🔒 Members Only · Compliance & Enforcement BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every Brief, six days a week.
Not ready to join? Take the free Pub K Weekly digest.One email. Free. Top industry articles, the community calendar, and the latest job postings.