★ Annual Review 2027 tickets now on sale Get your tickets →

News/Compliance & Enforcement/Court Not Impressed by “Wait and See” Approach to Amending Complaint When Relator Claims He Knew of Allegations All Along; United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania No. 16-683, U.S., et al. ex rel. Timothy Sirls v. Kindred Healthcare Inc., et al.
False Claims Act·Compliance & Enforcement Brief

Court Not Impressed by “Wait and See” Approach to Amending Complaint When Relator Claims He Knew of Allegations All Along; United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania No. 16-683, U.S., et al. ex rel. Timothy Sirls v. Kindred Healthcare Inc., et al.

The district court denied the relator’s motion for reconsideration of its decision dismissing with prejudice a portion of his claims that were precluded by the public disclosure bar.

🔒 Members Only · Compliance & Enforcement BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every Brief, six days a week.
Not ready to join? Take the free Pub K Weekly digest.One email. Free. Top industry articles, the community calendar, and the latest job postings.