Compliance & EnforcementResources
ArchiveResources
1,265 articles from the Compliance & Enforcement Brief.
Articles
🔒 Members Only · Compliance & Enforcement BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every Brief, six days a week.
Exact Timing of Government’s Knowledge Immaterial to Jury’s Guilty Verdict; United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, Southern Division, No. 1:16-CV00369 HTW-LRA, U.S. ex rel. James Aldridge v. Corporate Management Inc., et al.
Fifth Circuit Unconvinced by “Everyone Knew” Standard of Knowledge; United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit No. 18-31078, U.S. v. Jonathon Nora
Conclusory Statement on Materiality Not Enough to Support Allegations; United States District Court for the District of New Jersey No. 16-1817 (RMB/KMW), U.S. ex rel. Sharon Lampkin v. Pioneer Education LLC, et al.
NDAA Anti-Retaliation Language Did Not Require States to Waive Sovereign Immunity When Accepting Federal Funds; United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit No. 20-60051, Texas Education Agency v. U.S. Department of Education
Court Asks Defense Counsel for Documentation Showing Legitimacy of Invoices, Citing Defendants’ History of Hiding, Spending Down Assets; United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, Southern Division, No. 1:16-CV00369 HTW-LRA; U.S. ex rel. James Aldridge v. Corporate Management Inc., et al.
Citing Campie, Ninth Circuit Partially Reverses Dismissal of FCA Complaint Alleging Underlying Fraud on the FDA; United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit No. 19-56377, U.S. ex rel. The Dan Abrams Company LLC v. Medtronic Inc., et al.
Defendants’ Alleged Conduct Suggests They Knew Noncompliance was Material; United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Columbia Division, No. 3:19-cv-03403-JMC, U.S. ex rel. Jeffrey Harbit and Alan Inglett v. Consultants in Gastroenterology P.A., et al.
Successful Qui Tam Defendant Can’t Recover Costs She Didn’t Pay; United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, Southern Division, No. 1:16-CV00369 HTW-LGI, U.S. ex rel. James Aldridge v. Corporate Management Inc., et al.
School District Immune from FCA Claims, but Employees Might be Liable; United States District Court for the Northern District of California No. 16-cv-06994-PJH, U.S. ex rel. Steven Fallon et al. v. Bell Transit Corp., et al.
Reverse False Claims: Government Can Show Obligation To Repay Even if Presentment Claims Should Fail; United States District Court for the Southern District of New York No. 1:15-cv- 4179 (CM), U.S. ex rel. Uri Bassan v. Omnicare Inc., CVS Health Corp.
Court Split: Sixth Circuit Says FCA Anti-Retaliation Provision Also Applies to Former Employees; United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit No. 20-1002, U.S. ex rel. David Felton M.D. v. William Beaumont Hospital
FCA Litigation Warrants Higher Hourly Rate for Counsel; United States District Court for the Southern District of New York No. 17 Civ. 7163 (AT), U.S. and New York ex rel. Soner Yasti v. Nagan Construction and Nadir Uygan
Plaintiff Fails to Argue Reasons for Termination were Pretextual; United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, No. 3:17-CV-1782-BK, Susan Regene De Sessa, et al. v. Dallas County Hospital District
10-Year Limitations Period Begins on Date Claim is Submitted, Not Date Government Sends Payment; United States District Court for the District of Utah No. 2:14-cv-00701-JNP, U.S. ex rel. Mark Christopher Tracy v. Emigration Improvement District, et al.
Government’s Claims Accrued When Invoices Were Submitted, Not When Kickback-Tainted Subcontracts Were Awarded; United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, No. 4:06-CV-04024, U.S. ex rel. Bud Conyers v. Halliburton Company and Kellogg Brown & Root Inc. et al.
Novartis Updates Anti-Bribery Policy Following Settlements
No Evidence Landlord Connected to Fraud Committed by Tenant; United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, Northern Division at Covington, No. 16-cv-217 (WOB), Cathy McComas v. Wells Market
Defendants Can’t Duck Responsibility for Creating Sham SDVOSB; United States District Court for the Western District of New York No. 15-CV-0887-FPG, U.S. v. Lee Strock, et al.
Court Sacks Affirmative Defenses Shifting Burden of Proof to Defendant; United States District Court for the Northern District of California No. 20-cv-01691-DMR, U.S. ex rel. Thomas Grinner, et al. v. Dana Ogden
Keep reading
