Compliance & EnforcementResources
ArchiveResources
1,265 articles from the Compliance & Enforcement Brief.

Articles

🔒 Members Only · Compliance & Enforcement BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every Brief, six days a week.
Plaintiff Failed to Rebut Argument that He Copy/Pasted Complaint Details from Previous Cases; United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, No. 19 CR 7289, Edward Allen v. Sterling Capital Partners, et al.
Simple Billing Errors Insufficient to Support FCA Case; United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania No. 20-2027, U.S. ex rel. Alisha Alejandro v. Philadelphia Vision Center, et al.
Plaintiff Can Pursue Retaliation Claims Under FCA, State Law; United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, Eastern Division, No. 4:20-cv-00404-AGF, Candise Collins v. Gershman Investment Corp.
Utah Court Adopts “But-For” Standard for Causation in Retaliation Case; United States District Court for the District of Utah, U.S. ex rel. Brandon Barrick v. Parker-Migliorini International LLC, et al.
Anti-Corruption Compliance and Enforcement Trends in the US and Globally
AKS Safe Harbor Defense Undermined by Missing Information in Agency Agreement; United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, No. 12-cv-09306, Stop Illinois Health Care Fraud LLC v. Asif Sayeed, et al.
Relator Adequately Alleged Hospice Services were Unnecessary, Not Provided; United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, Northern Division, No. 3:16-CV-128-CWR-FKB, U.S. ex rel. Rhonda McClinton v. Southerncare Inc. dba Southerncare Hospice Services, et al.
Defendants Can’t Claim MACs Legitimized Claims for Unallowable Costs When They Withheld Relevant Information from Auditors; United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, Southern Division, No. 1:16-CV-369 HTW-LGI, U.S. ex rel. James Aldridge v. Corporate Management Inc., et al.
Lack of Candor Keeps Defense Counsel Waiting for Payment; United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, Southern Division, No. 1:16-CV00369 HTW-LRA; U.S. ex rel. James Aldridge v. Corporate Management Inc., et al.
What Did You Know and When Did You Know It? LabCorp Can’t Duck FCA Case Alleging it Knew of Kickbacks Arranged by Third-Party Testing Firms; United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Beaufort Division, No. 9:14-3699-RMG, U.S. ex rel. Scarlett Lutz and Kayla Webster v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
Defendants’ Internal Policy, Working Group Recommendations Undermine Claim They Were Unaware of State Regulations; United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, U.S. ex rel. Christine Martino-Fleming v. South Bay Mental Health Centers, et al.
Delayed Reaction: Relator Can’t Show Current Employer Retaliated for Whistleblowing on Previous Employer; United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, Macon Division, U.S. ex rel. Michael Rehfeldt v. Compassionate Care Hospice Group Inc., et al.
FCA Does Not Preempt State Case Seeking Damages for Malicious Prosecution; United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, No. 5:21-CV-25, Marietta Area Healthcare Inc., et al. v. Michael A. King and Michael D. Roberts M.D.
Court Declines to Take Jurisdiction Over FCA Case Against Foreign-Based NGO; United States District Court for the Southern District of New York No. 17-cv-4135 (PKC), U.S. ex rel. TZAC Inc. v. Christian Aid
No Meaningful Distinction between Federal, State FCAs that Requires Separate Analysis; United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit No. 20-2128, U.S. and the State of Michigan ex rel. Ashwani Sheoran RPh v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP, et al.
Too Much, Too Many, Too Long: Court Finds Subpoena Too Burdensome for Third-Party in Qui Tam Case; United States District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 21-mc-80065-JCS, U.S. ex rel. Omni Healthcare Inc. v. McKesson Corporation, et al.
Statute of Limitations on Retaliation Starts When Retaliatory Action Occurs, Not When Plaintiff Learns of It; United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division, No. 19-12822, Ali El-Khalil v. Oakwood Healthcare Inc.
Defendants Show String of Communications Showing Agency Knew and Approved of Conduct Relator Alleged was Fraudulent; United States District Court for the Central District of California No. 2:18-cv-05964-CAS(RAOx), U.S. ex rel. Nathan Lewis v. California Institute of Technology
Relator Failed to Define a Regulatory Standard from which Defendants Allegedly Deviated; United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania No. 2:19-CV-01220-CCW, U.S. ex rel. Diana Zaldonis v. University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, et al.
Keep reading


