Articles
🔒 Members Only · Protests & Claims BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every Brief, six days a week.
Protest Limns Murky Line Between Unstated and Implied Criteria
Awardee’s Pricing Was Unbalanced. Why Did the Awardee Still Get the Award?
OHA Reverses Size Determination. Why Didn’t the Challenged Business Qualify as a Manufacturer?
Does Your Protest Arguably Implicate the Solicitation’s Terms? Don’t Wait to File.
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Management of the Procurement Technical Assistance Agreement Program
Did the Government’s Denial of a Grant Application Amount to a Breach of Contract?
Agency Found Awardee’s Proposal Presented High Risk of Unsuccessful Performance. Why Wasn’t the Awardee’s Proposal Unacceptable?
Reminder from OHA: Previous NAICS Designations Are Not Precedential
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: DFARS Buy American Act Requirements
Solicitation Sought Past Performance from “Offeror’s Team.” Why Didn’t “Team” Refer to the Offeror’s Subcontractors?
Contractor and Agency Urge Different NAICS Codes for Procurement. OHA Says They’re Both Wrong.
Claim Contesting Liquidated Damages Was Questionable. Why Didn’t CBCA Dismiss It?
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Prohibition on Certain Procurements From the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region
Why Didn’t the Agency Have to Consider FCA Litigation Pending Against the Awardee?
Protester Can’t Complain About Evaluation When It Didn’t Follow Solicitation Requirement
Federal Acquisition Regulation – Prohibition on a ByteDance Covered Application
Beware of the Alleged Latent Ambiguity that Turns Out to Be a Protest-Negating Patent Ambiguity
Why Didn’t the Agency Need to Seek Clarifications for an Obvious Clerical Error?
Be Sure to Email Your Proposal to the Address in the Solicitation, Not the Address in the SAM Notice
Keep reading
