Articles
🔒 Members Only · Protests & Claims BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every Brief, six days a week.
GAO Ruled Agency’s Weakness Evaluations Were Clean
Agency Asked GAO to Modify Its Recommended Remedy. Why Did GAO Refuse?
GAO Cements the Solicitation’s Concrete Requirements
Two out of Three Is All You Need. OHA Says LLC Was Sufficiently Controlled by Qualifying Veterans
The Solicitation Was Ambiguous as to Whether this Position Was Key, But It Wasn’t Key to This Protest
GAO Permits Agency to Assign a Strength and a Weakness for the Same Approach
Can You Resurrect a Withdrawn Protest? No, Says GAO.
Protester’s Key Personnel Was Highly Qualified, But It Didn’t Merit a Strength
Protester Objected to a Weakness It Received for Multi-Hatted Personnel. GAO Didn’t See a Problem.
ASBCA Finds Government Cannot Prove Its Claim Against a Contractor
The Protester’s Helpdesk Was of No Help Securing This Task Order
GAO Severs Protest Grounds. Protester Only Reimbursed for One Challenge
Protester Prevailed on an Agency Protest But Didn’t Like the Resulting Corrective Action. Why Did GAO Think the Corrective Action Was Fine?
No Contract Means No Standing. OHA Dismisses Appeal Because Appellant Didn’t Hold the Relevant Contract
Protester Argued the Solicitation Only Asked for Historical Retention Rates, Not Historical Projects. GAO Did Not Agree
Protester Challenged Its Elimination, But Its Argument Was Really an Objection to the Solicitation’s Terms
GAO Says It’s Not About the Money Money Money. The Agency Considered More Than the Price Tag
Protester Argued It Should’ve Received More Strengths. GAO Disagreed, Finding Protester Had Merely Explained How It Would Meet the Requirements.
Three Strikes and You’re Out? GAO Thought Protester’s Proposed “Three Strike Rule” Was Unrealistic.
Keep reading
