Articles
🔒 Members Only · Protests & Claims BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every Brief, six days a week.
Contradictory Instructions in Sample Task, PWS Should Have Been Resolved Prior to Submission of Offers; GAO B-414649, Sygnetics, Inc.
Trend of Satisfactory Performance Not Derailed By Minor Irregularities, and Interim Performance Documents, Like Interim Work Papers, Are Not Relevant to Protest; GAO B-413321.4, Mark Dunning Industries, Inc.
Terms of RFP That Reflect Competitor’s Product Do Not Alone Make Solicitation Unduly Restrictive of Competition; GAO B-414566.2, Simplex Aerospace
Exclusion from Competitive Range Unobjectionable Where Protester’s Proposal Failed to Include Labor Category and Labor Hour Information Necessary for Evaluation; GAO B-414513.2, Enterprise Services, LLC
Negotiating Sole Source Award with WOSB HUBZone Concern Reasonable Even if Other Non-HUBZone WOSBs Could Meet Requirements; GAO B-414630, JRS Staffing Services
In-Sourcing Decisions Within Court’s Bid Protest Jurisdiction; COFC No. 17-934C, Mail Transportation Inc. et al v. United States
Protester Cannot Present Relevant Information it Failed to Provide During Protest; GAO B-414507.2, Timberline Helicopters, Inc.—Reconsideration
Ostensible Subcontractor Affiliation: Hiring Third-Party Employees OK
Well-Documented Consideration and Rejection of More Expensive Proposal with Only Slight Technical Benefit is Unobjectionable; GAO B-414189.2, Enhanced Veterans Solutions, Inc.
Submission of Confidentiality Agreement in Place of Required Teaming Agreement Not a Clerical Error That Can Be Cured with Clarifications; GAO B-414591, Defense Base Services, Inc.
Conflict Between Solicitation, Amendment Should Have Been Questioned Prior to Deadline for Proposals; COFC No. 17-80C, QTC Medical Services Inc. v. United States
Agency Enjoined from Taking Overly Broad Corrective Action; COFC Nos. 17-465C, Dell Federal Systems L.P. and Blue Tech Inc. v. United States
Area Office Did Not Consider Whether Awardee Was in Violation of Ostensible Subcontractor Rule; SBA No. SIZ-5835, Size Appeal of The Frontline Group
Appellants Cannot Recover Full Costs for Partially Successful Challenge of Terminated Contracts; PSBCA No. 6583, Cook Mail Carriers Inc.—Costs
Protester’s Eligibility for Award Did Not Factor into Decision to Take Corrective Action; COFC No. 17-362, American Sanitary Products Inc. v. United States
Government Improperly Disallowed Costs that Were Never Accrued or Charged; ASBCA No. 60190, Appeal of Northrop Grumman Corporation
Failure to Meet Incumbent Contract’s OCI Obligations Blocks Protester from Competing for Follow-On; COFC No. 17-835C, A Squared Joint Venture v. United States
Contractor Did Not Argue Same Legal Theories in Claim, Appeal; COFC No. 13-626C, Michael Roth & Associates Architects & Planners Inc. v United States
Contractor Did Not Argue Same Legal Theories in Claim, Appeal; COFC No. 13-626C, Michael Roth & Associates Architects & Planners Inc. v United States
Keep reading
