Articles
🔒 Members Only · Protests & Claims BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every Brief, six days a week.
The Government May Have Bought Your Product Before, But that Doesn’t Mean It’s Acceptable for Subsequent Procurements
GAO Finds Protester’s Proposal Was Not Equipped With An Equipment Plan
COFC Rules NASA Didn’t Breach; Rather the Contractor Effectively Repudiated
COFC Affirms that Owner Can’t Represent Their Company in Federal Court
GAO Finds Incumbent Advantages Did Not Taint Competition
GAO Finds Protester Lacked Standing to Challenge Allegedly Improper Award
COFC Sides With Protesters, Finds Agency Didn’t Properly Justify Sole-Source Award
COFC Rules the Army Botched the Cancellation of a Solicitation
GAO Affirms Agency’s Rejection of Program Manager’s Irrelevant Past Experience
The Solicitation Demanded a Delivery Schedule that No Vendor Had Ever Met. Why Didn’t GAO Find this Schedule Unduly Restrictive?
GAO Castigates Protester for Submission Filled with AI Hallucinations
Protester Could Not Escape Technical Downgrade for Services on Alcatraz Island
The Solicitation Was Clear: JCCS Registration Was Required
GAO Not Swayed by Protester’s Superior Retention Rate
Protest Overcomes Interested Party Hurdle But Stalls on the Merits
GAO Rules Increased Manpower Wins the Tradeoff Tug-of-War
Contractor Asserted Several Claims. ASBCA Only Found One Compelling.
Protester Claimed Agency Should’ve Used Existing Contract for Its Requirements. Why Did GAO Dismiss?
GAO Says Protester Should Have Spoken Up Earlier
Keep reading
