Articles
🔒 Members Only · Protests & Claims BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every Brief, six days a week.
Well-Documented Consideration and Rejection of More Expensive Proposal with Only Slight Technical Benefit is Unobjectionable; GAO B-414189.2, Enhanced Veterans Solutions, Inc.
Submission of Confidentiality Agreement in Place of Required Teaming Agreement Not a Clerical Error That Can Be Cured with Clarifications; GAO B-414591, Defense Base Services, Inc.
GAO Protective Orders (Post-Award Protest Primer #5)
Draft Cybersecurity Legislation Would Impose Substantial New Obligations on Vendors Selling Interconnected Devices to the US Government
Conflict Between Solicitation, Amendment Should Have Been Questioned Prior to Deadline for Proposals; COFC No. 17-80C, QTC Medical Services Inc. v. United States
Area Office Did Not Consider Whether Awardee Was in Violation of Ostensible Subcontractor Rule; SBA No. SIZ-5835, Size Appeal of The Frontline Group
Applicability of the Buy American Act and Trade Agreements Act
What DOD's Reorg Means for Tech and Acquisition
What DOD’s Reorg Means for Tech and Acquisition
NDAA Section 811: New Waiver Authority—What Does It Mean?
SBA Launches New HUBZone Map
Appellants Cannot Recover Full Costs for Partially Successful Challenge of Terminated Contracts; PSBCA No. 6583, Cook Mail Carriers Inc.—Costs
Protester’s Eligibility for Award Did Not Factor into Decision to Take Corrective Action; COFC No. 17-362, American Sanitary Products Inc. v. United States
Government Improperly Disallowed Costs that Were Never Accrued or Charged; ASBCA No. 60190, Appeal of Northrop Grumman Corporation
OPM CIO Fires Back at GAO Over Cybersecurity Audit
Failure to Meet Incumbent Contract’s OCI Obligations Blocks Protester from Competing for Follow-On; COFC No. 17-835C, A Squared Joint Venture v. United States
Contractor Did Not Argue Same Legal Theories in Claim, Appeal; COFC No. 13-626C, Michael Roth & Associates Architects & Planners Inc. v United States
Contractor Did Not Argue Same Legal Theories in Claim, Appeal; COFC No. 13-626C, Michael Roth & Associates Architects & Planners Inc. v United States
NAICS Code Encompassed Services Required Under Construction Management Contract; SBA No. NAICS-5832, NAICS Appeal of Ascendant Program Services LLC
Keep reading
