
Articles

🔒 Members Only · Protests & Claims BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every Brief, six days a week.
BPA Call Orders Subject to CDA; CBCA Nos. 3516, Coast to Coast Computer Products v. Department of Agriculture
Offeror’s Failure to Demonstrate Technical Acceptance Under Each Subfactor As Required by RFQ Results in Ineligibility for Task Order Award; GAO B-414691, Harmonia Holdings Group LLC
Alaska Native Corporations May Rely on Sister Companies for Experience Without Risking Affiliation Under Ostensible Subcontractor Rule; SBA No. SIZ-5843, Synergy Solutions Inc.
VA Withdraws Proposed SDVOSB Regulatory Overhaul
Disaster Relief Contracting: How to Avoid the Pitfalls
VIEWPOINT: What Defense Contractors Owe Employees Serving in Danger Zones
Contractor’s Continuous Delays on Construction Contract Warrant Termination for Default, CBCA No. 4078 Affiliated Western, Inc.
Government Delays Before Modification to Extend Delivery Do Not Excuse Default; ASBCA No. 61027, Thunderstruck Signs
COFC Considers Government’s Request to Conduct Additional Depositions Unnecessary, Overly Cumulative, and Prejudicial; COFC No. 15-1070C, MWH Global, Inc.
Winning the Corrective Action, and Using Clarifications Instead of Discussions
SBA Size Update: Strategies for Contesting Affiliation Based on Economic Dependence
Three Contract Protests Lodged Against NSA
Pentagon Official Sheds Light on Ongoing Industrial Base Study
How GAO Responds When it Perceives a Threat to Procurement Integrity
Procedurally Non-Protestable Issues (Post-Award Protest Primer #7)
Agency Has Broad Discretion to Select GSA Schedule for Purchasing; GAO B-414743, Phoenix Environmental Design, Inc.
Dan Snyder: 2016 A Good Year for Big Federal Contractors
Loss of SDVOSB Status After Award Has No Bearing on Standing to Bring Protest; COFC No. 16-186 C, Geiler/Schrudde & Zimmerman, A Joint Venture v. United States
Loss of SDVOSB Status After Award Has No Bearing on Standing to Bring Protest; COFC No. 16-186 C, Geiler/Schrudde & Zimmerman, A Joint Venture v. United States
Keep reading


