Articles
🔒 Members Only · Protests & Claims BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every Brief, six days a week.
Protester Does Not Need Current Contract to Challenge Insourcing Decision; COFC No. 17-824C, Loomacres Inc. v. United States
Offeror Fails to State A Claim Against Government For Misevaluating And Misappropriating Proprietary Information From His Unsolicited Proposal; COFC No. 17-417C, Brian X. Scott v. United States
What Ever Happened to that Obama-Era Overtime Rule?
Congressional, Executive, and Legal Developments for Government Contractors to Consider – October 2017
OHA Confirms Size Eligibility Is Determined on Date for Initial Offers, Not Date for Final Proposal Revisions; SBA No. SIZ-5851, Stellar Innovations and Solutions Inc.
Agency’s Attempt to Shift Its Contractual Responsibility to Execute Utility Agreement Breaches Implied Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing and Causes Performance Delay; COFC 13-1023 C, MW Builders Inc. v. United States
Protest of Approved-Source Restriction Must Be Filed Before Proposal Deadline
Enhanced DoD Debriefing Requirements in the Senate Version of the FY 2018 NDAA May Reduce Bid Protests
Attempted Retraction of Online Bid Unsuccessful Where IFB Terms Clearly Precluded Retraction, and Offeror Failed to Conduct Due Diligence Before Bidding; U.S. Court of Federal Claims Case No. 16-420C, Zebel LLC v. United States
RFPs Not Required to Eliminate All Risk or Remove Every Performance Uncertainty; GAO B-414962, B-414962.2, Owl, Inc.; MLB Transportation Inc.
Oral Statements That Contradict Solicitation Do Not Legally Bind Agency to Evaluation Criteria; GAO B-415029, Technology and Telecommunications Consultants Inc.
Presumptive Awardee Ineligible to Challenge Solicitation Terms, Says GAO
So You’re Finally Compliant with the DFARS and NIST Requirements, but Are Your Subcontractors?
Procurement Priorities Take Cues from Commercial Space
No More Defense Industry Nominees, McCain Tells Trump
Default Termination Converted to One for Convenience Where CO Relied on Non-Existent Contractual Obligations; ASBCA No. 58623, Asia Commerce Network
Binding Arbitration Agreements for Key Employees Must Be Examined Prior to Award; GAO B-414902, L3 Unidyne, Inc.
Contractor’s Letter Claiming It Was Canceling the Contract Is Sufficient Basis for Default Termination; ASBCA Nos. 58383, 58619, 58620, Rashed Elham Trading Company
DOE Issues Class Deviation to FAR 31.205-44(a), Training and Education Costs, and Approval of Training on Overtime
Keep reading
