
Articles

🔒 Members Only · Protests & Claims BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every Brief, six days a week.
Reminder: Changes to Subcontracting Reporting Requirements—Effective November 30, 2017
Third Time’s Not a Charm; Disparate Compensation Evaluation Leaves Navy Stranded
Employment of New Concern’s Members by Large Contractor Not Enough to Establish Affiliation; SBA No. SIZ-5865, Global Native Services Inc.
Best Value Decision Minimizing Evaluated Strengths Is Unreasonable; GAO B-414648.2, B-414648.3, Protection Strategies Inc.
Discussions Vs. Clarifications Vs. Communications, And Agency Discretion (Post-Award Protest Primer #12)
Compensation for Changed Work Not Enough to Fully Compensate for Unchanged Work According to CBCA
Category Management and Small Business Contracting
Cyber DFARS: What Does It Mean for Contractors?
Alan Chvotkin: RFIs, Live Participation Can Be Costly for Contractors
Unsubstantiated Allegations of Modifications to Task Order After Award Insufficient to Bring Protest Within GAO’s Jurisdiction; GAO B-414410.4, Epsilon Systems Solutions Inc.
Failure to Address Discussion Question Provides Reasonable Basis to Find Proposal Unacceptable; GAO B-415035, Geotech Environmental Services Inc.
A Refresher on the Major DoD Counterfeit Parts Clauses
Pending Dispute Over Contract Performance Prompts Agency to Find Contractor Non-Responsible and Rescind Bid Award on Separate Project
Shutdown Negotiations Between White House and Democrats Break Down Before Starting
Agency Not Obligated to Seek Clarification or Accept a Late Submission Due to Protestor’s Failure to Respond to RFQ’s FAR Provisions; GAO B-414852.2, FEI Systems
Federal Court Interprets SDVOSB “Unconditional Ownership” Less Strictly Than SBA
Ostensible Subcontractor Rule Does Not Apply to Similar Entities
Lankford Cites Almost a Half-Trillion in Government Waste
Only Spent Nuclear Fuel Costs Related to Storage Are Recoverable; COFC No. 14-1001C, Duke Energy Progress, Inc. and Duke Energy Florida, Inc. v. United States
Keep reading


