Articles
🔒 Members Only · Protests & Claims BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every Brief, six days a week.
Agency Was Not Required to Qualitatively Assess Offerors’ Corporate Experience; Ausley Associates, Inc., GAO B-417509, B-417509.2, B-417509.3
Background in “Preparing for Board Meetings” Does Not Merit a High Corporate Experience Rating; Jefferson Consulting Group, LLC, GAO B-417555, B-417555.2
Proposal Sunk by Generalities and Conclusory Statements; NikSoft Systems Corporation, GAO B-415716.28, B-415716.33
Protest Filed a Month After Award Still Timely Due to Errors in Award Notice; Gulf Civilization General Trading & Contracting Company, GAO B-417586
Failure to Distinguish Proposal from Other Higher-Rated Proposals Dooms Protester’s Standing; Zeidman Technologies, Inc. v. United States, COFC No. 17-1662C
Seven-Day Response Time Reasonable for Solicitation Seeking Commercial Items; Warrior Service Company, GAO B-417574
Protester’s Concession that It Could Not Perform Allegedly Restrictive Requirement Negated Its Interested Party Status; Israel Aerospace Industries, GAO B-417681
Related Case Pending in District Court Did Not Impact COFC’s Tucker Act Jurisdiction; State of Oklahoma et al. v. United States, COFC No. 19-1022C
Change to the Small Business Act Does Not Affect Solicitation Until SBA Promulgates a Rule Implementing the Change; TechAnax, LLC; Rigil Corporation, GAO B-408685.22, B-408685.25
Agency’s Rejection of Quote that Was 90 Seconds Late Did Not Undermine Competition; Criterion Systems, Inc. v. United States, COFC No. 19-593C
Post-Award Challenge to Fairness of Procurement is Untimely; American Justice Solutions, Inc., GAO -B-417171.2
Instruction to “Please Include” Government-Provided Prices in Proposal was a Requirement, not a Suggestion; Safeguard Base Operations, LLC v. United States, COFC 18-61C
Option Allowing Government to Purchase Leased Property Did Not Restrict Competition; Second Street Holdings, LLC et al. v. United States, COFC No.19-473C
Agency Not Required to Shield Offeror from Being Undercut by Competitors; Centre Market Building, LLC, GAO B-417413.2,B-417413.3
Protester’s Response to a Market Survey Shows It’s an Interested Party; Technology Advancement Group, Inc., GAO B-417609
Court Denies Protest but Declines Government’s Suggestion to Extend Blue & Gold Waiver; COFC No. 19-369C, Technatomy Corp. v. United States and Solers Inc. et al.
Transfer of Ownership to Eligible Service-Disabled Veteran Does Not Invalidate Certification; SBA No. CVE-126-A, CVE Appeal of Oasys International Corp.
GAO Declines to Consider LOGCAP V Protests; GAO B-417506.2, AECOM Management Services, Inc., et al
GAO Will Not Review Insourcing Decision; GAO B-417531, Tom & Jerry Inc.
Keep reading
