Articles
🔒 Members Only · Protests & Claims BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every Brief, six days a week.
Protester Manages to File Premature and Belated Protests; Kaiyuh Services, LLC, GAO B-419293, B-419293.2
We’re Not So Different, You and I: Meaningful Distinctions Between Proposals Negates Protester’s Disparate Treatment Allegation; LinTech Global, Inc., GAO B-419107
“That’s Exactly What I Was Looking For!” Not Irrational for Agency to Find Incumbent Contract Most Relevant Past Performance Reference; Prosecure, LLC v. United States, COFC 20-724C
Agency Improperly Accepted Quote that Took Exception to Solicitation Requirements; Innovative Management & Technology Approaches, Inc, GAO B-418823.3, B-418823.4
“I’m a Winner. Things Are Gonna Change. I Can Feel It.” Protester Unable to Poke Holes in Agency’s Evaluation; Picturae Inc., GAO B-419233
“Seeing as How the VP Is Such a VIP Shouldn’t We Keep the PC on the QT?”: Proposal’s Severe Case of AAHS—Acute Acronym Hypertrophy Syndrome—Proves to Be Terminal; People, Technology & Processes, LLC v. United States, COFC No. 20-1043C
“Come On and Take a Free Ride”: Protester Can’t Sit Back and Rely on Another Vendor to Diligently Pursue Protest Grounds; Integration Technologies Group, Inc., GAO B-419116.3
Agency Not Required to Raise Concerns with Proposals During Oral Q&A Session; All Points Logistics, Inc., GAO B-418700.2
Protester Unable to Convince GAO that Its Proposal Contained Unacknowledged Strengths; Cognosante MVH, LLC, GAO B-418986 et al.
Federal Circuit Sidesteps Question Concerning Constitutionality of Federal “Printing Mandate” While Reversing COFC Decision Denying Bid Protest; Veterans4U LLC v. United States, Fed. Cir. 2020-1175
Protester Can’t Wiggle Out of Its Failure to Include Required Overtime Rates in Its Proposal; Ahtna-RDI JV, Inc., GAO B-418012.6, B-418012.7
Agency Erred in Overlooking Awardee’s Lack of Relevant Past Performance; OneSource PCS, LLC, GAO B-419222
Protester Can’t Overcome Inconsistencies in Its Proposal; Oak Grove Technologies, LLC, GAO B-418427.6, B-418427.10
Agency Not Obligated to Notify Offeror of an Error in Its Proposal; High Noon Unlimited Inc., GAO B-419268
“You’re a Rich Girl, and You’ve Gone too Far ‘Cause You Know It Don’t Matter Anyway”: Awardee Was No Longer Small, But Award Under Small Business Set Aside Was Still Cool; Amaze Technologies, LLC, GAO B-419141 et al.
“Oh, Oh Here She Comes, Watch Out Boy She’ll Chew You Up”: Protester Learns the Hard Way that Proposal Deadline Is a Maneater; Richen Management, LLC, GAO B-419253
“I Can’t Go For That, No Can Do”: Agency Tossed Quote Because Vendor Offered the Same Key Personnel Under Two Different Solicitations; AttainX, Inc., GAO B-419306, B-419306.2
“One on One I Want to Play that Game Tonight”: Agency Performed Thorough “Rule of Two” Analysis; Veteran Shredding, LLC v. United States, Fed. Cir. 2020-1336
Federal Circuit Holds that Bid in Excess of Agency’s Funding Does Not Necessarily Negate Offeror’s Standing to Protest; Land Shark Shredding, LLC v. United States, Fed. Cir. 2020-1230
Keep reading
