Compliance & EnforcementResources
ArchiveResources
1,265 articles from the Compliance & Enforcement Brief.
Articles
🔒 Members Only · Compliance & Enforcement BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every Brief, six days a week.
Retaliation Claim Fails Absent Underlying False Claims; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky No. 5:17-15-KKC, Sue Smith v. LHC Group Inc. and Kentucky LV LLC
Questions About Employer’s Billing Practices, Without More, Not Enough to Show Plaintiffs Engaged in Protected Activity; U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia No. 15-355 (RMC), Charles Hutchins and Joyce Subhi v. DynCorp International Inc., et al.
Plaintiff’s Poor Performance Undermines Allegation Her Firing Was Pretextual; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit No. 19-10042, Rebecca Musser v. Paul Quinn College
Multiple Defendants Can Be Sued for Retaliation When Each Created an Employee-Employer Relationship With Plaintiff; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania No. 19-1235, Alastair Crosbie v. Highmark Inc., Highmark Health Options, and Gateway Health Plan
Statistical Analysis and Witness Interviews Create Strong Inference of Fraud; U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division No. SA-17-CV-1249-XR, U.S. ex rel. Integra Med Analytics LLC v. Creative Solutions in Healthcare Inc.
Government Must Disclose Any Evidence Kickbacks Directly Caused Additional Surgeries; United States District Court for the District of Minnesota No. 13-cv-3003, U.S. ex rel. Kipp Fesenmaier v. the Cameron-Ehlen Group Inc. and Paul Ehlen
Court Finds No Reason to Delay Payment of Attorney Fees to Successful Defendants; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington No. 2:17-CV-0191-TOR, U.S. ex rel. Randolph Peterson and Tri-City Railroad Company LLC v. Port of Benton County
Healthcare Qui Tam Case Survives Motion to Dismiss on Back of Relator’s Personal Knowledge of Fraudulent Activity; United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida No. 8:16-cv-961-T-27AEP, U.S. ex rel. Delia Bell v. Cross Garden Care Center LLC and Karl E. Cross
Fraudulent Activity, Without the Submission of False Claims, Insufficient to Support Qui Tam Case; United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division No. 1:15-cv-511, U.S. et al. v. Fazzi Associates Inc., et al.
Government Must Investigate Qui Tam Claims, but Not to Any Set Standard; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania No. 17-2040, U.S. ex rel. NHCA-TEV, LLC v. Teva Pharmaceutical Products LTD, et al.
Retaliation Claim Cannot Stand Up Without Protected Conduct; U.S. District Court for the District of Maine No. 1:17-CV-00229-LEW, Claire Adams v. Penobscot Community Health Care, et al.
Relator Doesn’t Need Magic Words to Allege Medicare Fraud; U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division No. 19-CV-1883-B, Christy Nichols v. Baylor Research Institute, et al.
Need for Access to Public Documents Precludes Seal Requests; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania No. 17-3523, Chris Purcell, et al. v. Gilead Sciences Inc.
Second Circuit Finds Broad Application of FCA Language Covers Federal Reserve Loans; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit No. 18‐1746, United States ex rel. Robert Kraus and Paul Bishop, et al. v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
Court Triples Damages After Defendant Fails to Appear; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, Western Division No. 4:17-CV-174-D; United States and the State of North Carolina v. A Perfect Fit for You Inc., et al.
Defendant Could Not Violate Rule CMS Did Not Properly Promulgate; United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania No. 12-CV-4239; Jesse Polansky M.D. et al. v Executive Health Resources Inc. et al.
Corporation Cannot Defend Itself in Qui Tam Action; U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, No. 3:12-CV-4377-M; U.S. ex rel. Lawrence M. Smith v. Deion L. Sanders, et al.
FCA Does Not Preclude Prevailing Defendants from Recovering Certain Litigation Costs; United States District Court for the District of New Jersey No. 1:08-cv-2126-NLH-AMD, Victoria Druding, et al. v Care Alternatives
USAID Final Rule: Revisions to the Incentive Awards Program for Personal Services Contractors
Keep reading
