Compliance & EnforcementResources
ArchiveResources
1,265 articles from the Compliance & Enforcement Brief.
Articles
🔒 Members Only · Compliance & Enforcement BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every Brief, six days a week.
Officials Informed of Alleged Fraud Could Plausibly Have Influenced Decision to Terminate Relator’s Employment; United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division No. 3:19-CV-1883-B, Christy Nichols v. Baylor Research Institute et al.
Potential Penalties Under Corporate Integrity Agreement Too Speculative to Form Basis of FCA Claim; United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania No. 15-6829; U.S. ex rel. Lena Sturgeon et al. v PharMerica Corp.
Amtrak Specifically Excluded from FCA Coverage, Including Retaliation Claims; United States District Court for the District of Columbia No. 19-cv-470 (EGS), U.S. ex rel. Gary Talbot v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak)
Attorney Billings for Amended Complaints, Opposing Government’s Settlement Are Reasonable; United States District Court for the District of Idaho No. 1:15-cv-00210-DCN, U.S. ex rel. Julie Madsen M.D. v. St. Luke’s Health System Ltd. et al.
Failing to Meet Grant Goals Does Not Mean Defendants Never Intended to Comply; United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts No. 1:12-cv-12193-IT, U.S. ex rel. Ken E. Williams v. City of Brockton Police Department et al.
Allegation That Old Healthcare Fraud Scheme Continued Not Enough to Overcome Public Disclosure Bar; United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, Eastern Division, No. 1:17-cv-01079-STA-jay, U.S. ex rel. Gurpreet Maur M.D. v. Elie Hage-Korban M.D., Delta Clinics PLC, et al.
Court Holds Medicare National Coverage Determinations are Binding and May Form the Basis of FCA Claims; United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division, No 1:18-cv-587, U.S. ex rel. Donald Lynch M.D. v University of Cincinnati Medical Center LLC, et al.
Falsified Labor Hours Material to Government’s Decision to Pay Invoices and Establish Payment for Future Options; United States District Court for the District of Columbia No. 15-2105 (ABJ), U.S. ex rel. Larry Hawkins et al. v ManTech International Corporation, et al.
Amendments to Whistleblower Protections Expanded Coverage for Relators, not Liability to Company Employees; United States District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division No. 2:17-cv-527-TC, Travis Cella v. MobiChord Inc., et al.
Defendant Can’t Explain Alleged Billing Fraud As Compliance Requirement; United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, No. 2:16-CV-00432-JRG, U.S. ex rel. Caleb Hernandez and Jason Whaley v. Team Finance LLC
Amount the Relator Would Have Recovered But For Government’s Separate Settlement Counts as Alternate Remedy; United States District Court for the District of Nevada No. 3:12-cv-00295-LRH-CLB, U.S. ex rel. Cecelia Guardiola v. Renown Health et al.
Medical Opinions Not Immune From FCA Scrutiny; United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit No. 18-3298, U.S. and the State of New Jersey ex rel. Victoria Druding et al. v. Care Alternatives
Manipulation of Borrower Income Data Not Merely Incidental to Compliance with Government Mortgage Insurance Program Rules; United States District Court for the Central District of California No. CV 19-1630 PSG (JPRx), U.S. ex rel. Malou Tutanes-Luster v. Broker Solutions Inc.
Evidence Too Thin to Show Pharma’s Speaker Events Were Actually Kickbacks; United States District Court for the Southern District of New York No. 13-CV-3700 (KMW), U.S. ex rel. Steven M. Camburn v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Defendant Says He Can’t Be Held Vicariously Responsible for Misconduct, But Government Says It’s Personal; United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville Division No. 3:16-cv-0549, U.S. and the State of Tennessee ex rel. Suzanne Alt et al. v. Anesthesia Services Associates PLLC d/b/a Comprehensive Pain Specialists, et al.
Government Cannot Use Relator’s Qui Tam Case to Argue He Also Engaged in the Alleged Fraud; United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville Division No. 3:16-cv-0549, U.S. and the State of Tennessee ex rel. Suzanne Alt et al. v. Anesthesia Services Associates PLLC d/b/a Comprehensive Pain Specialists, et al.
OFCCP Did Not Show It Adequately Enforced EEO Requirements on Federal Construction Contracts
Halliburton Can’t Recover Costs Only Tangentially Related to Document Production; United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit No. 19-7064, U.S. ex rel. Harry Barko v. Halliburton Company et al.
Absentee Plaintiff Fails to Present Own Side of Story; United States District Court for the Western District of Washington No. C18-1680 TSZ, Sharon Shumpert v. HealthPoint Centers of King County
Keep reading
