Compliance & EnforcementResources
ArchiveResources
1,265 articles from the Compliance & Enforcement Brief.
Articles
🔒 Members Only · Compliance & Enforcement BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every Brief, six days a week.
Relator Gets Third Chance to Show Surgery Quota Induced Purchases of Defendants’ Medical Devices; United States District Court for the District of Maryland No. 1:17-cv-00668-SAG, U.S. ex rel. Matthew Fitzer M.D. v. Allergan Inc., et al.
Jury Reasonably Found Defendant Acted Intentionally to Avoid Anti-Dumping Duties; United States District Court for the Central District of California No. 2:17-cv-04393-RGK-KS, U.S. ex rel. Island Industries Inc. v. Vandewater International Inc.
Evidence Showed Hospice Provider’s Poor Patient Documentation, but Not that Government Cared About It; United States District Court for the District of New Jersey No. 08-2126, Victoria Druding, et al. v. Care Alternatives Inc.
Termination Connected to Complaints About Fraudulent FDA Application Not Actionable Under FCA Without Claims for Payment; United States District Court for the Southern District of New York No. 21 Civ. 4945 (LGS), Kenneth Hennrick v. miR Scientific LLC
Government Need Not Make Affirmative Defense For Defendant; United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, No. 1:14-cv-01215-RLY-DLP, U.S. ex rel. Thomas Fischer v. Community Health Network Inc.
Protected Activity Lasted 18 Months but Only Most Recent Counts for Temporal Proximity; United States District Court for the District of Minnesota No. 16-cv-1296 (MJD/ECW), Gregory Kvidera v. WECsys LLC
Eleventh Circuit Upholds Summary Judgment on Retaliation Claim; United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit No. 21-10421, Darius Clarke M.D. v. HealthSouth Corporation, et al.
Government’s Partial Intervention Does Not Prevent Relators from Pursuing Non-Intervened Claims; United States District Court for the Southern District Ohio, Western Division, No. 1:15-cv-555, U.S. ex rel. Brandee White, et al. v. Mobile Care EMS & Transport Inc., et al.
Hostile Termination Process Undercuts Defendant’s Argument that Plaintiff’s Firing was Legitimate Business Decision; United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Northeastern Division No. 2:15-cv-00065, U.S. ex rel. Duane Seabury v. Cookeville Regional Medical Center Authority
Competing Experts, Scienter Dispute Block Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment; United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Columbia Division No. 3:20-cv-00803-CMC, U.S. ex rel. Lewis Eastlick v. William Thomas Odom II
Eleventh Circuit: District Court Properly Shifted Burden of Proof Once Defendants Made Their Case; United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit No. 21-11064, U.S. ex rel. Delia Bell v. Cross Garden Care Center LLC, et al.
Court Finds No Clear Intent Congress Intended to Abrogate Eleventh Amendment Immunity for FCA Retaliation Claims; United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, Macon Division, No. 5:21-CV-89 (MTT), Taquila Monroe v. Fort Valley State University, et al.
Government Does Not Measure CID Response by Weight; United States District Court for the District of New Mexico No. 21mc24 WJ/SCY, in re: Civil Investigative Demand No. DNM 20-08
FCA Defendant Can’t Use His Kids to Shield Assets; United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Beaufort Division, No. 9:14-0230-RMG, U.S. v BlueWave Healthcare Consultants Inc. et al.
Court Orders Bank Defendants to Produce Documents That Could Help Scuttle Their Summary Judgment Motions; United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division, No. 4:14-CV-00833, U.S. ex rel. Andrew Mitchell v. CIT Bank N.A., et al.
Court Finds Reasonable Inference of False Claims When Patients Are Covered Only by Medicare; United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island No. 1:18-CV-000435-JJM-LDA, U.S. ex rel. John Carbon v. Care New England Health System, et al.
Relator Can’t Demonstrate Scienter When Defendants Followed CMS Reporting Guidance; United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, No. 19 C 825, Patrick Lupinetti v. Exeltis USA Inc., et al.
Second Circuit Says Lower Court Erred in Considering Government Audits Outlining AECOM Billing Issues; United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit No. 20-2756-cv, U.S. ex rel. Hassan Foreman v. AECOM Government Services Inc.
Challenge to Relator’s Standing in Separate Qui Tam Publicly Disclosed Allegations in Defendants’ Response Suit; United States District Court for the District of Minnesota No. 20-cv-0704 (WMW/DTS), The Cameron-Ehlen Group Inc. v. Kipp Fesenmaier
Keep reading
