Compliance & EnforcementFalse Claims Act
ArchiveFalse Claims Act
3,592 articles from the Compliance & Enforcement Brief.
Articles
🔒 Members Only · Compliance & Enforcement BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every Brief, six days a week.
Mississippi Department of Human Services Agrees to Pay $5 Million to Resolve False Claims Act Liability in Connection With Snap Quality Control
Escalated Reporting Provides Temporal Proximity Needed to Show Causation in Retaliation Claim; United States District Court for the Southern District of New York No. 17 Civ. 4007 (KPF), U.S. and the State of New York ex rel. Marianne T. O’Toole v. Community Living Corporation, et al.
Court Enters Judgment Totaling More Than $32 Million on Mississippi Jury’s $10.8 Million Verdict, Demonstrating Risks for Defendants Found Guilty of False Claims Act Violations at Trial
Evidence Presented in Patent Hearing Triggers Public Disclosure Bar; United States District Court for the Northern District of California No. 3:18-cv-01496-JD, Zachary Silbersher v. Valeant Pharmaceuticals International Inc., et al.
Lender Liability and False Claims Act Issues Under the Paycheck Protection Program
Relator Need Not Rely on Personal Qualifications When Medical Guidance and Patient Records Indicate Procedures Were Medically Unnecessary; United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida No. 2:17-cv-237-FtM-29MRM, U.S. ex rel. Andrea Schultz v. Naples Heart Rhythm Specialists P.A. and Kenneth Plunkitt
Block Billing Precludes Court from Determining that All Hours Billed Were Used for Successful Claim; United States District Court for the Southern District of New York No. 14 Civ. 4958 (ER), U.S. ex rel. Mary Bixler Wood v. Avalign Technologies Inc., et al.
A Lawyer Walks Into A [Public Disclosure] Bar . . . .
Contractor Can Recover Costs Defending Itself in Qui Tam Case; COFC No. 17-1763C, The Tolliver Group Inc. v. United States
Rule 9(b) Not Proper Pleading Standard for Retaliation Claim; United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, El Paso Division, No. 3:19-CV-319-PRM, Andrea Procter Paige v. AM Hospice Inc.
Government Plausibly Alleged Defendant Did Not Meet or Intend to Meet Grant’s Financial Management Requirements; United States District Court for the Eastern District of California No. 2:20-cv-00321-JAM-KJN, U.S. v Owen Hughes
“Worthless Services” Theory in False Claims Act Cases Dealt Another Blow
CARES Act Is ‘Déjà Vu All Over Again’ for Corporate Investigations
Protecting Your Organization Against Paycheck Protection Program Qui Tam Actions
COVID-19: What History Tells Us About the Importance of the False Claims Act in a Time of Pandemic
$4.47 Million False Claims Act Settlement Targets Set-Aside Contractors, Affiliates, and Even Third-Party Bonding Company
U.S. Paycheck Protection Program Loan Recipients: Risks of Qui Tam Actions Under the False Claims Act
The PPP Litigation Wave Is Coming: Anticipated “Qui Tam” Lawsuits Under the False Claims Act
False Claims Act Exposure for Beneficiaries of the Public Health and Social Services Emergency Relief Fund: Mitigating Risks of Ambiguous Terms & Conditions
Keep reading
