Compliance & EnforcementFalse Claims Act
ArchiveFalse Claims Act
3,592 articles from the Compliance & Enforcement Brief.
Articles
🔒 Members Only · Compliance & Enforcement BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every Brief, six days a week.
Over-Valuation of Acquired Medical Facility Might Be Illegal Kickback; United States District Court for the District of Arizona No. CV18-8041-PCT-DGC, U.S. ex rel. Gregory Kuzma v. Northern Arizona Healthcare Corporation, et al.
Relator Adequately Alleged Financial “Recycling” Scheme but No Actual False Claim; United States District Court for the District of Arizona No. CV-18-8040-PCT-DGC, U.S. ex rel. Gregory Kuzma v. Northern Arizona Healthcare Corporation, et al.
Let’s Talk FCA: DOJ False Claims Act Investigations (Part 1)
Materiality of Cyber Defect Questionable When Agencies Could Have Worked with Vendor to Address It; U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia No. No. 15-cv-608 (TFH), U.S. ex rel. Phillip M. Adams v. Dell Computer Corporation et al.
Three Defendants Charged in Multi-Million Dollar Medicare Fraud Scheme
New York Physical Therapy Providers Settle Civil Healthcare Fraud Allegations
San Diego Laboratory Phamatech Agrees to Pay $3 Million to Settle Fraudulent Medicare Billing Case
Just in Time for Flu Season: Qui Tam Case Alleging Roche Mispresented Efficacy of Tamiflu Can Proceed: United States District Court for the District of Maryland No. GLR-14-3665, U.S. ex rel. Thomas Jefferson v. Roche Holding AG, et al.
FCA Suit Alleging Manufacturer Fraudulently Induced HHS to Stockpile $1.4B of Tamiflu to Prevent Influenza Pandemic Allowed to Proceed
OCI Reporting Covered by FCA, but Too Much Time Passed Between Whistleblowing and Termination; United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, Northeastern Division, No. 5:17-cv-1797-LCB, Mary Dobbins Katerheinrich v. Al-Razaq Computing Services
Investigator’s Reports Covered by Work Product Doctrine; United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Northeastern Division, No. 2:13-cv-00035, U.S. et al., ex rel. Debra Norris v. David G. Florence
Relator Had the Details of a Scheme, but No False Claims for Payment; United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, No. 8:17-cv-2647-T-24 JSS, U.S. ex rel. Martin T. Girling D.P.M. v. Specialist Doctors’ Group LLC
Two Defendants Agree to Plead Guilty to Multi-Million Dollar Medicare Fraud Scheme
Government Did Not Provide Timely Notice of Unjust Enrichment Calculation, but Defendant Had All the Information it Needed; United States District Court for the District of Columbia No. 08-0961 (PLF), U.S. v. Honeywell International Inc.
Relator Fails to Allege Kickback Scheme with Particularity, but Antitrust Claims Survive; United States District Court for the District of New Jersey No. 20-188 (RBK/KMW), United Association of Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 322 of Southern New Jersey v. Mallinckrodt ARD LLC, et al.
Failure to Set Payment Schedule No Basis for Overturning Qui Tam Settlement; United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit No. 19-15141, Maria Broadnax v. Sand Lake Cancer Center P.A., et al.
Two Kinds of False Claims, the Same Bad Outcome
Defendants Can’t Duck Allegations They Billed for Services Provided to Absent Patients; United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia No. 3:16cv653, U.S. ex rel. Sethina Fortunatè and Michael Hockaday, et al. v. NDUTIME Youth and Family Services Inc., et al.
Woulda, Coulda, Shoulda: Allegation of What Defendants “Would Have Done” Insufficient to Support Knowledge of False Claims; United States District Court for the Southern District of New York No. 12 Civ. 5103 (LGS), U.S. ex rel. Michael I. Levine M.D. v. Vascular Access Centers L.P. et al.
Keep reading
