Compliance & EnforcementFalse Claims Act
ArchiveFalse Claims Act
3,592 articles from the Compliance & Enforcement Brief.
Articles
🔒 Members Only · Compliance & Enforcement BriefYou’ve reached the member portion of this brief.Members read the full analysis and the source documents in every Brief, six days a week.
Government Does Not Measure CID Response by Weight; United States District Court for the District of New Mexico No. 21mc24 WJ/SCY, in re: Civil Investigative Demand No. DNM 20-08
FCA Defendant Can’t Use His Kids to Shield Assets; United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Beaufort Division, No. 9:14-0230-RMG, U.S. v BlueWave Healthcare Consultants Inc. et al.
South Carolina Chiropractor Admits Wrongdoing, Will Pay $9 Million False Claims Act Judgment
Medicare Advantage Enforcement: DOJ Advances New Theories Based on Retrospective Chart Reviews
Court Orders Bank Defendants to Produce Documents That Could Help Scuttle Their Summary Judgment Motions; United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division, No. 4:14-CV-00833, U.S. ex rel. Andrew Mitchell v. CIT Bank N.A., et al.
Court Finds Reasonable Inference of False Claims When Patients Are Covered Only by Medicare; United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island No. 1:18-CV-000435-JJM-LDA, U.S. ex rel. John Carbon v. Care New England Health System, et al.
Relator Can’t Demonstrate Scienter When Defendants Followed CMS Reporting Guidance; United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, No. 19 C 825, Patrick Lupinetti v. Exeltis USA Inc., et al.
Second Circuit Says Lower Court Erred in Considering Government Audits Outlining AECOM Billing Issues; United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit No. 20-2756-cv, U.S. ex rel. Hassan Foreman v. AECOM Government Services Inc.
In Another Blow to the “Uninsurability” Defense, Court Holds that Settlement Labeled “Restitution” is Insurable
OIG Approves a Free Drug Program Limited to Hospital Inpatients
Challenge to Relator’s Standing in Separate Qui Tam Publicly Disclosed Allegations in Defendants’ Response Suit; United States District Court for the District of Minnesota No. 20-cv-0704 (WMW/DTS), The Cameron-Ehlen Group Inc. v. Kipp Fesenmaier
Made It By That Much: Relator Cites Cases Supporting Materiality, but Government’s Lack of Intervention Leaves Court Dubious; United States District Court for the District of New Jersey No. 16-1817 (RMB/KMW), U.S. ex rel. Sharon Lampkin v. Pioneer Education LLC, et al.
OIG Permits Physician-Employer to Retain Profits from Anesthesia Services Provided by CRNA in Physician Office and ASC
Underbilling Government for Wages Does Not Violate FCA; United States District Court for the District of Maryland No. TDC-21-0310, Graham v. Honeywell International Inc.
Court Agrees that Sensitive Cybersecurity Information Can be Filed Under Seal in Motion for Summary Judgment; United States District Court for the Eastern District of California No. 2:15-cv-02245 WBS AC, U.S. ex rel. Brian Markus v. Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings Inc.
Additional Information Provided by Defendants Gave Governments Good Cause to Intervene After Deadline; United States District Court for the Southern District of California No. 3:18-cv-00822-BEN-BGS, U.S. ex rel. Randy Lazar v. S.M.R.T. LLC and Cornelius McKay
Don’t Use “Build Back Better” to Sabotage the False Claims Act
To Intervene or Not to Intervene?: The Third Circuit Sides With the Seventh Circuit on Assessing Government Motions to Dismiss
DOJ Files Complaint in AWP False Claims Act Suit Against Pharmaceutical Ingredient Seller
Keep reading
